Fifth International Scientific Conference on | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prevention of Workrelated Musculoskeletal Disorders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
July 11-15, 2004 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
KEYNOTESUnderstanding mechanisms - evidence based implementationProf. Barbara Silverstein, USA Why is there such societal resistance to taking steps to prevent WMSDs? Policy relavant research is necessary but not sufficient to bring about change. The issue of “personal control” of risk is fundamental to choosing effective prevention strategies. Regulatory policy has little to do with existing data or public health. It is directed at risks not within personal control. Based on the same scientific information, Australia eliminated lead based paints 50 years before the US. Why? The process of public health protection (research->risk assessment-> risk management-> risk communication) is applicable to changing behavior. Ignoring components in this process may result in inappropriate interventions. Individual and group risk perceptions depend on knowledge, newness, voluntariness, control, dreadness, catastrophic potential and equity. Lessons from public health (lead, a failed US smallpox vacination campaign and SARs) and regulation (Washington State) can help improve the prospects for WMSD prevention. Prof. Francesco Violante, Italy and Prof. Mats Hagberg, Sweden Valid case definitions for general use among researchers are crucial to advance science and a requirement for practicing clinical medicine according to science and best practise. In the history of work-related musculoskeletal disorders we have used concepts that have hampered the development of valid case definition. There are no scientific consensus criteria for most ICD-10 (International Classification of Disease) musculoskeletal related diagnoses to be considered in workers. We suggest that the process for a new feasible case-definition system for the neck and upper extremity should start by a consensus of criteria for diagnosis of common musculoskeletal disorders in primary care developed by a panel consisting of the key disciplines. Epidemiological, intervention and health surveillance case definitions may have the clinical diagnose as gold standard. Prof. Dr. med. Bernd Hartmann, Germany The highest levels of loads and musculo-skeletal disorders exist in the construction industry.
Investigation into the physical stress at the workplace is the basis and background for developing
methods of prevention. Methods are therefore necessary that can exemplary capture patterns of loads
from handling weights, working in forced postures, repetitive hand-arm-work and vibrations. Periodic
health surveys of employees with high levels of physical load, and suitable diagnostic methods are
essential tools for prevention. The methods of medical examination of the muskulo-skeletal-system
require improvement with respect to the standardization of questionnaires and clinical diagnostics.
Occupational medicine has focussed its methods of diagnostics upon functional disturbances,
in contrast to the differential diagnostics of nosologic disorders by physicians.
Prof. Dr. med. Siegfried Mense, Germany Work-related muscle pain is probably due to a multitude of factors that act
in concert, with different emphasis in different patients. Prof. Tores Theorell, Sweden Changing individual behaviour or developing organisation? There is growing evidence that external factors in the work environment, psychosocial as well as physical, are of importance to many health outcomes, including musculoskeletal disorders. Such environmental factors are perceived by the individual and there is a never-ending discussion whether the main target of health promoting workplace interventions should be the individual or the organisation. Both with regard to psychosocial and physical factors in the environment, it is obvious that coping could be improved on the individual level and that organisational improvement could be health promoting. One of the problems in this controversy has been that it is practically more easy to perform well-conducted controlled studies of health promotion on the individual level. Organisational interventions require larger samples, are much more difficult to design and are often lost in the evaluation process due to structural changes, for instance merger, outsourcing and downsizing. In the planning phase of organisational interventions good intentions are often diluted and the power of the intervention therefore weakened. These difficulties may explain why there are more controlled studies indicating good health promotion effects of interventions on the individual level than there are on the organisational level. The contribution will discuss these problems theoretically and also give examples of organisational and individual interventions that have been successful. Prof. Dr. Frank Lehmann-Horn, Germany Louise Rutz-LaPitz, Switzerland Motor Control is the study of the nature and cause of movement. Knowledge of the Systems Model of Motor Control, which is task oriented, helps in the assessment and understanding of the clients problems which is the baseline for rehabilitation. Motor Learning is the study of the acquisition or modification of skills. Motor Learning principles assist the therapist with strategies on how to guide the client to their best performance with carryover / learning to everyday life situations. Dr. Eva Schonstein, Australia Musculoskeletal work-related disability amongst employed adults carries a significant
cost, both in terms of personal suffering and economic loss. Prof. Dr. Jan Dul, The Netherlands Prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSD's) is not a big issue in the business world. Companies are striving for competitiveness, and are interested in programs that create more quality for less money. Although prevention of WMSD's may be cost-effective at macro-economic level, at micro level this is not believed to be true by most organizations. It seems that only legislation, fear for claims or complaints of workers can force interventions. The business world might become interested in programs that create less WMSD's, if it can be shown that these programs are cost-effective on the short and longer term. Moreover, when primary prevention of musculoskeletal disorders is rephrased and integrated into a concept of human-centered design of products and processes, in which both social and micro-economic goals are considered, a shift from the negative side of business to the positive side of business might be possible. In such approach, prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders is a tool for an economic goal, although this is not possible in all situations. In this keynote address, a model is given, and examples are shown, on how human-centered design of products and processes may contribute to competitive advantage of companies. Consequences are discussed for the positioning of the ergonomics field and its experts in the business world.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
contact: premus2004@iha.bepr.ethz.ch . last update: November, 2004 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||